I'm trying to sort out the rear-end mods to my FP to match the NR rear wheel (or at least not embarrass it) and I've come to loathe the RC36 cush-drive monster hub-sprocket-carrier-thing, or whatever it's called. I've considered fitting an entire RC30 swing arm, which would be the dog's bollocks, with its exotic brake torque arm and sexy good looks, but they are about 35mm shorter than the RC36 swinger (not to mention kinda rare on the second-hand market). And there's no place to mount the torque arm to the RC36 frame, either...
RC30 Swing Arm1.jpg
RC30braketorquearm2.jpg
And here's the OEM RC36 swing arm:
Hideous braced swingarm 2.jpg
(Okay, OEM doesn't look this bad, but I couldn't resist!)
But, I think I could simply replace the sprocket carrier with the one from the RC30. In fact, I may have to, as I'm using a modified RC30 axle/hub to fit the RC40 rear wheel. OEM RC30 rear sprocket is 40T, and RC36 is 43T, but it shouldn't be hard to find--or even have made--an RC30 rear sprocket with 43T, methinks.
The two-pot sliding brake caliper has to go as well. I've got an SP1 (RC51) rear caliper and m/c on the way, which is modern, gold and probably a lot lighter. I'd love to mount it below the swing arm (like on the RC30), but as the torque arm mount is on the top of the swing arm, that might be difficult...
RC36 cum RC30-04.jpg
I have collected a number of extra swing arms in the garage (I'm an aspiring BC Guy...) and yesterday I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the NC30 alloy torque arm uses the same mounting bolts as the OEM RC36 swiss-cheesed steel torque arm (though it is longer). You can see it peeking out from behind the rear brake disc on my 4-bolt-converted NC30:
PA250014x.jpg
I should be able to do something with that, the SP1 rear caliper, the RC30 sprocket carrier and some sort of peek-a-boo with the rear brake line...
Oh, back to the reason for my post: any reason I should try to keep the cush drive?
Question
JZH
I'm trying to sort out the rear-end mods to my FP to match the NR rear wheel (or at least not embarrass it) and I've come to loathe the RC36 cush-drive monster hub-sprocket-carrier-thing, or whatever it's called. I've considered fitting an entire RC30 swing arm, which would be the dog's bollocks, with its exotic brake torque arm and sexy good looks, but they are about 35mm shorter than the RC36 swinger (not to mention kinda rare on the second-hand market). And there's no place to mount the torque arm to the RC36 frame, either...
RC30 Swing Arm1.jpg
RC30braketorquearm2.jpg
And here's the OEM RC36 swing arm:
Hideous braced swingarm 2.jpg
(Okay, OEM doesn't look this bad, but I couldn't resist!)
But, I think I could simply replace the sprocket carrier with the one from the RC30. In fact, I may have to, as I'm using a modified RC30 axle/hub to fit the RC40 rear wheel. OEM RC30 rear sprocket is 40T, and RC36 is 43T, but it shouldn't be hard to find--or even have made--an RC30 rear sprocket with 43T, methinks.
The two-pot sliding brake caliper has to go as well. I've got an SP1 (RC51) rear caliper and m/c on the way, which is modern, gold and probably a lot lighter. I'd love to mount it below the swing arm (like on the RC30), but as the torque arm mount is on the top of the swing arm, that might be difficult...
RC36 cum RC30-04.jpg
I have collected a number of extra swing arms in the garage (I'm an aspiring BC Guy...) and yesterday I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the NC30 alloy torque arm uses the same mounting bolts as the OEM RC36 swiss-cheesed steel torque arm (though it is longer). You can see it peeking out from behind the rear brake disc on my 4-bolt-converted NC30:
PA250014x.jpg
I should be able to do something with that, the SP1 rear caliper, the RC30 sprocket carrier and some sort of peek-a-boo with the rear brake line...
Oh, back to the reason for my post: any reason I should try to keep the cush drive?
Cheers,
Link to comment
Share on other sites
66 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.