V4 Rosso

Are you sure the CB600F Hornet triples are a match for your forks? The Hornet has 41mm USD fork and your's is a 43mm.

Thanks :fing02: This weekend tere is a big MC show here also, maybe bring my tape measure and notebook with me :biggrin: +1, his topic is on my watch list too.

Are you willing to share some of these measurements? I am looking into this swap myself but did not find trustworthy info. I found fork length numbers of 745mm and 750mm, fork spacing 215mm. Also did you measure the fork offset of the Kawa triples?

If you're asking if it is a reputable company, the answer is yes. I have no personal experience with them but a lot of the riders in the national competitions use their products.

That's what I liked about the Streepilot III, that it had buttons for e.g. zooming and panning. My SP2820 didn't and that's why I got myself a "perfect cradle", works a lot better than a touch screen.

I don't think upside down forks on a pre veefalo VFR are a good idea:

Looks like an easy way to clean the chain :fing02: Here they sell a similar product: Kettenmax that also has a container to catch the dirty cleaning fluid.

I didn't like it at first but it turned out very well :fing02:

On what trace said (both versions :biggrin: ) John, when I search for some sientific data that backs up all the claims I only find websites that say: Do you have any links that point to some scientific studies that contain factual data? The use of hydroxy boosters has been studied since WW1 but most of the researches come up with youtube vids to show how well their system works. Haha, holding a white pice of paper close to the exhaust pipe and claiming (i'll translate here) it spits out zero soot, zero CO, zero HC and 30% fuel saving and CO2 reduction! Instead of backing up claims by mentionig mpg and holding white pieces of paper near the exhaust pipe, why not put the engine on a dynometer or sticking an exhaust gas analiser in the can? What is different about your setup compared to the kits allready available on the market that justifies spending $250.000 in R&D?

Well done, she looks great :cheerleader: