Jump to content
  • 0

Lowering Links


vanion2

7075 Aluminum flat link lowering kits  

  1. 1. Would these be safe to use?

    • Yes
      0
    • No
      0


Question

  • Member Contributer

I ordered a set of lowering links for my wife's Ninja 500. Due to a poorly written description of the links I ended up with 7075 aluminum flat links (as opposed to 303 stainless steel which was included in the description). I did some research on 7075 aluminum and apparently it is widely used in the aerospace industry for its light weight and high strength.

My question is this: Are these safe to use?

My biggest concern is the hole separation between the inner and outer holes (stock = inner, 2" lower = outer). It is .066" aluminum which seems pretty damn thin to me. If lowering the bike required use of the inner hole I would be more comfortable with that but I have to use the outer hole and my fear is that separation won't be thick enough to hold up very long.

I filed the RMA this morning but I can cancel it easily enough should the consensus be these are safe. TIA as always. :fing02:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Got a pic?

Aluminum without a bushing, and only 1/16" thick could wear more quickly than you'd like it to. It won't immediately fail though. Stock Honda triangles on our VFR's are non-bushed, 2-3mm (080-125") thick and carry the entire stress of the suspension... alloy unknown though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Contributer

Got a pic?

Aluminum without a bushing, and only 1/16" thick could wear more quickly than you'd like it to. It won't immediately fail though. Stock Honda triangles on our VFR's are non-bushed, 2-3mm (080-125") thick and carry the entire stress of the suspension... alloy unknown though.

I will post a pic up this afternoon. It does not have any bushings. The separation is 1.67mm if that helps at all.

Not failing immediately indicates failure at some point and that won't work for me. I do love my wife after all. :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Contributer

I put a lowering link on a 500 a few years back, will be riding with her this weekend and will check it. To be honest I cant remember the style we used on that bike...We also made a few out of T-6061....see no reason T-7075 would be an issue

Best one I saw was one a friend bought for his F4I....adjustable and well built

On a side note...we also took a couple inches of foam out of the stock seat and narrowed the foam also, that made a huge difference :fing02: Being 5' nuthing she needed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i remember the thin triangle plates on the vfr being stainless steel. and the dogbone being pretty thick aluminum when i pulled mine off...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Contributer

i remember the thin triangle plates on the vfr being stainless steel. and the dogbone being pretty thick aluminum when i pulled mine off...

Not to be argumentative, but I believe the triangles are type also some type of aluminum alloy. Stainless steel is generally too brittle for that type of duty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most who race an EX500 use the FOGbones from ex500.com that are aluminum. I raced one and installed them and it made a world of difference on turn in by raising the rear. My opinion is the aluminum is fine for this application. But lowering the rear will negatively affect the handling unless you drop the front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.