Jump to content

WIN6

Member Contributer
  • Posts

    167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Image Comments posted by WIN6

  1. Florida probably isn't a great place to judge handling, but it seems like it's a bit more, willing to change direction (?) at lower speeds. It sucks for parking lot manuvering with the decrease in lock to lock rotation. The brakes and fork rigidity are worlds better. The stock forks always made me wonder how people did stoppies, they felt unstable to me (the forks, never done a stoppie), but that may have been the poor condition of the stock brakes as well.

    I'm not sure what the weight is, I'll try to get it on our shipping scale here at work, but I don't imagine it's really that much lighter. It's basically just plastic that's missing.

    Oh yeah, switching to the wider rear wheel and a 180 made it feel much more comfortable to lean deep into a corner than the 170 on the narrower rear wheel, which was infinitely better than the 180's egg profile that was shoehorned onto a wheel narrower than it was made for.

  2. Yeah, it's actually sketchier than it looks too. . . I should probably shorten the kickstand since the cbr forks are shorter. It doesn't lean over as far as it used to. It's also probably 4 feet or so down to the water. . .

  3. It was tough. . . Not quite the highest point in Florida, but definitely one of the higher points in the Everglades. Apparently it actually counts as a significant geological feature for the area.

  4. So. . . I was thinking how little sense it made to do this with a VFR (especially with all the plastic and mirrors) and it occured to me that 'it's heavy' and 'there are plenty of cheaper, lighter bikes' are decent arguments against it. . . but they are decent arguments against taking one to the track too. . .

    just saying. . .

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.